In David
Brooks’ The Road to Character, the idea that two basic
forms of character are constantly at sway is introduced, these occurring
within the modern human as either a force of positivity and virtue, or of
dangerously competitive self-benefit. The two types of character are referred
to as their own entities in a figurative sense, going by the names Adam I and
Adam II. Brooks alludes modern society's vacuous chase of happiness to the belief
that being materialistically successful− an Adam I attribute− will bring
satisfaction, yet he believes true satisfaction of is only available through
the more difficult-to-reach values of Adam II.
The
Road to Character is heavily reliant upon the differences between Adam
I and Adam II character types. The characteristics of Adam I and Adam II are not based
solely upon actions, but primarily the desires and motivation for which an action is completed. Adam I can be observed as focused on business minded,
material success, whereas Adam II seeks internalized growth and satisfaction.
One way the actions of the opposing characters can be assessed is that Adam I
will assist someone in need if it benefits their own personal gain, while Adam
II will assist those in need due to the belief that it is just the right thing
to do. Adam I cannot exist without Adam II, but the pursuit of happiness in
which Adam I is often found is fruitless, joy only attainable by the soft moral
diligence of Adam II.
Using these figments to help portray the composition of human nature, Brooks
delved deep into the lives of multiple people, one happening to be a woman
named Day. She changed her life to become a nun, and the moral work began
joyously for her, yet the glamour faded as she hid her own redemption within
assisting others, making it a tireless, daunting task. This reflects the
disruption between Adam I and Adam II− the conflict that occurs within each
individual’s character at different levels of severity as Adam I attempts to
strangle out the Adam II in hopes of gaining satisfaction.
Through Brooks' own self-assessment and peeking into the lives of figures that portrayed dominant Adam I or II traits, the subject
of The Road to Character boils down to Brooks words in the
introduction, "Adam I aims for happiness, but Adam II knows that
happiness is insufficient. The ultimate joys are moral joys."
-Hannah Rockwood
The concept of Adam I and Adam II is quite interesting. One has a similar belief as others who think that materials will make them happy while in reality, the other (Adam II) is actually what people truly desire by simply being satisfied with their life. I also believe that Adam I cannot live without Adam II because Adam II has the satisfaction that Adam I truly desires. Without Adam II, Adam I will lose his purpose in life as his achievements would be for nothing.
ReplyDelete